Catch risks before they merge
Every pull request, reviewed against your architectural threat model. Findings, fixes, and the context to ship them.
Oplane Security Review
Oplane identified security requirements relevant to this PR and checked the implementation against them, finding that 3 requirements need attention. Push changes to rerun the review, update a status with a justification if needed, or review the generated threat model.
| Requirement | Severity | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompt Injection Mitigation for Scope Discovery PromptsOPLANE_REQ-00074550 | High | Prompt·Claude·Cursor | |
| Protection of AWS Account IDs and Model ARNs in Local ConfigurationOPLANE_REQ-00074219 | Low | Prompt·Claude·Cursor | |
| Concurrency Control for Bedrock API Judge Calls in compare.pyOPLANE_REQ-00074220 | Medium | Prompt·Claude·Cursor | |
| Environment Variable Allowlist Enforcement for Child Subprocesses in Eval HarnessOPLANE_REQ-00074218 | High | ||
| Model Selection Integrity for Phase Routing in run_ctm_agentOPLANE_REQ-00074551 | High |
Security reviews can't keep up with shipping speed
Code merges daily. Manual security reviews happen quarterly at best. The gap between what ships and what gets reviewed keeps growing.
Security review on every PR, automatically
Three steps. Every pull request gets the same rigorous security review: no bottlenecks, no waiting.
Reads the diff
Oplane analyses every changed file against the existing threat model. Trust boundaries, data flows, new endpoints. All mapped.
Surfaces findings
Only flags what matters. Each finding ties back to a specific architectural risk with severity and context.
Proposes the fix
Every finding includes a specific, code-level fix. Apply it in one click or adapt it to your codebase.
Pre-merge, not post-incident
Every PR gets the same structured security review. No more ad hoc processes or hoping someone remembers to check.
- 01
Catch issues before they reach main
Every PR is reviewed against the threat model before merge — not after deploy, not in the next quarterly audit.
- 02
Fewer false positives, less noise
Findings are scoped to the change in front of you, with the architectural context to know what actually matters.
- 03
Structured review per PR, not ad hoc
The same checks run on every change. No more relying on the one engineer who remembers to look at auth code.
- 04
Maps findings back to the threat model
Each finding is linked to the architectural threat it affects, so reviewers see the system-level impact, not just the line.
- 05
Track security posture over time
Trend lines per repo and per team turn PR-level findings into a posture you can present to a board or auditor.
- 06
AI-assisted remediation with clear guidance
When a fix is mechanical, Oplane proposes the patch. When it isn’t, it explains the trade-offs in plain language.
Secure by design, not patched after the fact
Most security tools find problems after they ship. PR Analysis catches them as they're being introduced, when the developer still has full context and the cost to fix is at its lowest.
In the workflow you already use
Catch the next risk before it merges
Connect a repo. Open a PR. See Oplane reviewing alongside your team in minutes.