For Scale-ups

Security leverage, not headcount

For Series A–C engineering teams shipping AI products faster than security can keep up.

Try for free →Request a demo

10min

To first architectural finding

Consultants or architects needed

EveryPR

Reviewed against your threat model

Trusted by AI-native engineering teams shipping at scale

Who this is for

Built for the team without a security team

A 10–80-engineer company at Series A–C, with SOC 2 or ISO underway and customer security questionnaires landing faster than anyone can answer them.

You're shipping MCP servers and agent features without a framework for the threats they introduce, and a senior security architect isn't a realistic hire at this stage.

A typical Oplane scale-up

profile · series A–C

Team size10–80 engineers

StageSeries A–C

ShippingMCP serversAgent features

ComplianceSOC 2 underwayISO underway

Security HC0–1 generalists

With OplaneSenior architect coverage

Use cases

What scale-ups use Oplane for

Where Oplane lands in a 10–80-engineer org, and which product handles each job.

01Replace stale docs with a living threat modelContinuous, architecture-level threat modeling per repo. No consultant cycles. No Notion drift. Always current.Continuous Threat Modeling→

02Review every pull request for architectural riskTrust boundaries, data flows, new endpoints. Each PR mapped back to the threat model with a specific fix recommendation.PR Analysis→

03Secure AI-generated code at the sourceOplane runs as an MCP inside Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and any agent. Architectural checks fire while the code is being written.AI Coding Security→

04Stay audit-ready without dedicated security headcountSOC 2 and ISO evidence collected continuously, not scrambled the week before the auditor arrives.Audit-ready by default→

05Show enterprise buyers continuous evidenceA current threat model plus a per-PR audit trail is the artifact procurement and risk teams actually want to see.Compliance→

“

As part of our evaluation, we tested several alternatives, including Cursor Security Review, but Oplane consistently delivered deeper, more actionable findings.